QuickBooks may lead the pack when it comes to accounting packages, but a number of excellent apps are available that might suit your needs a bit better. Download the all new QuickBooks Mac and Windows App powered by QuickBooks Online. Download the all new QuickBooks Mac and Windows App powered by QuickBooks Online. How it Works Support Sign In. Windows-like toolbar and menu; Open multiple windows at the same time.
QuickBooks 2016 has been updated to work with Sierra. Doesn't matter how old the boxed version you buy is, just make sure to apply all updates.
Intuit once again decided to treat Mac users like dirt and announced there won't be a QuickBooks 2017 for Mac. They simply put out an update that fixes the 2016 version to work correctly in Sierra. That and updated tax tables for 2017. Otherwise, nothing added to it. I mention this even though you're looking for an alternative because there is no way to import QuickBooks data into other accounting software. I've looked more than once. MYOB will do it if you send your data to them, but the charge is xxx amount per record.
Think how many invoices, customer names, banking transactions and other records your current database has. It would easily cost you hundreds of dollars, if not over a thousand to have your QB data converted for use in their software. Much cheaper to upgrade QuickBooks. It's either that, or what many companies do if they want to switch is leave their current accounting software data where it is at year end (or wherever their fiscal year ends) and start an entirely new database with the new accounting software. You take the time to manually set up all of your customer contacts, banking info, accounts, items and other fixed data before the fiscal switch so it's ready to take over. Then you start all future accounting data there (typically January, 1st) and keep the old software around for looking up previous year data.
The upcoming online version of QuickBooks is one of the reasons Intuit still owns QuickBooks but sold off Quicken to a private equity group. They tried taking Quicken online with Mint but that didn’t go over too well. People are leery about keeping financial data on a server somewhere, especially with massive hacks being announced almost daily.
I’m actually quite pleased with Quicken 2016 on my iMac. The new owners seem serious about improving the product and it is updated regularly. No, it still isn’t feature synced with the Windows version but I’ve also looked at the macOS alternatives and none seem to be all that great goin beyond the basics. Apple Footer. This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple may provide or recommend responses as a possible solution based on the information provided; every potential issue may involve several factors not detailed in the conversations captured in an electronic forum and Apple can therefore provide no guarantee as to the efficacy of any proposed solutions on the community forums.
Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the.
I'm looking for a solution to allowing Mac's access to Quickbooks enterprise Solutions 12. I have 12 mac users that need to have access to Quickbooks. Quickbooks enterprise as far as I know doesn't have an installer for OSX. Only 4 of the Mac's are Intel's otherwise I would just use virtual box or any other vmware to install windows and Quickbooks on a virtual machine. I currently have them connect through remote desktop to a workstation that has Quickbooks installed but it's not a very idea solution since I end up having to reboot the host box frequently. If any one has come up with a good way to support Mac clients in Quickbooks enterprise environment I would be happy to learn how you did it.
I didn't see enterprise 12 on that list so I'll see what happens. Since using Quickbooks enterprise 3 years now I haven't had any issue that required me to get support (knock on wood) yet. But your right it would suck to not be supported, I'm really just curious to see if it runs though.
It would require a lot more testing maybe by one or two users before I installed on the rest. Yep Quickbooks would not start after the installation. That was version 11 that I was trying first, now I'm trying version 12 but I'm expecting the same outcome. Oh well it was worth a shot. TigerBlood wrote: I didn't see enterprise 12 on that list so I'll see what happens.
Since using Quickbooks enterprise 3 years now I haven't had any issue that required me to get support (knock on wood) yet. But your right it would suck to not be supported, I'm really just curious to see if it runs though. It would require a lot more testing maybe by one or two users before I installed on the rest.
Still, the fact that all the ones that have been tried say that they don't work, and the rest say unknown is a bad sign. I used to work at Intuit, so I'm intimately familiar with QuickBooks (I actually started there supporting QBES) - I've never talked to anyone who got Crossover working. Your best bet is either VMs or TS, like Tim recommends. Anything else either won't work, or worse, will cause data corruption as Tim says. TigerBlood wrote: I would prefer to just do VM's or Terminal Server but most of the Macs are PowerPC and I'm pretty sure that you can't use VMware on that architecture.
If I set up a Terminal server with Server 2008 R2 SP1 would I be able to access the hosted application from a mac, I don't have any experience with Terminal Services and haven't read the documentation yet. Terminal Services is your best bet, and it is easy to setup. Costs a bit for the licensing, but worth it in saving you the hassle. Using TS means you only have to upgrade the one installation, and you don't have to deal with the mess of the database hosting. The Mac version split off from the Windows version a long time ago. It got cancelled a couple of times and then resurrected. The end result is that the Mac version is behind the Windows version in terms of features, and there is no Enterprise client for Mac.
Your one other option would be QuickBooks Online, but that is only if you can get by without the Enterprise features that QBO doesn't have. And I don't know if you can convert from Enterprise data files to QBO yet, so you'd have to check that. TigerBlood wrote.If I set up a Terminal server with Server 2008 R2 SP1 would I be able to access the hosted application from a mac, I don't have any experience with Terminal Services and haven't read the documentation yet. With just the MS software (MS TS server, MS TS client app on Mac) the user experience would be similar to their current experience using remote desktop to access a Windows Workstation. With additional software you are able to make the application on the terminal server act like it's a local application. I normally use Citrix for this, but many options exist. Tim7139 wrote: Server 2000 and 2003 also have TS Server, but lack application publishing.
Citrix is installed over top of TS. Yep I just wanted to check out the application publishing feature, I know you said it wouldn't work for Macs but just still wanna see how it functions. Does Citrix require Terminal Services or can it be stand alone? If I use a Citrix solution do I need to have licenses for the TS and Citrix? Sorry for the dumb questions I have the same amount of experience with Citrix as I do with TS which is none. Lister: Where is everyone Hol? Holly: They're dead Dave.
Lister: Who is? Holly: Everybody Dave.
Lister: What Captain Holister? Holly: Everybody's dead Dave. Lister: What Todd Hunter? Holly: Everybody's dead Dave. Lister: What Selby?
Holly: They're all dead, everybody's dead Dave. Lister: Peterson isn't, is he? Holly: Everybody is dead Dave.
Lister: Not Chen? Holly: Gorden Bennet, yes Chen, everybody, everybody's dead Dave. Lister: Rimmer? Holly: He's dead Dave, everybody's dead, everybody is dead Dave.
Lister: Wait, are you trying to tell me everybody's dead? Holly:.slightly under breath. Shouldn't have let him out in the first place!